![]() It already plans to increase the number of interceptors stored in silos at Fort Greely in Alaska and Vandenberg Air Force Base in California to 44 by 2017. The Pentagon maintains a fleet of 30 rocket-like interceptors designed to shoot down incoming threats such as nuclear missiles as part of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system. “We had held back from pursuing military applications for this technology,” he said.The potential locations for housing ground-based interceptors are Fort Drum in upstate New York Camp Ethan Allen Training Site in Vermont Naval Air Station Portsmouth SERE Training Area in Maine Camp Ravenna Joint Training Center in Ohio and Fort Custer Training Center in Michigan. officials had tried to avoid spurring a scramble for hypersonic missiles. Wood, the arms control diplomat, implied that U.S. Which we definitely weren’t.”ĬLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER "A new system to evade our defenses is only threatening if we were planning all along to destroy/intercept China’s ICBMs in a crisis. “China already has ~100 nuclear-armed ICBMs that can strike the U.S.,” Middlebury Institute’s Jeffrey Lewis wrote on Twitter. missile defense systems, some analysts have argued that the latest innovation adds little to China’s ability to strike the U.S. ![]() While the report suggests that China has developed missiles that can avoid U.S. ![]() "We have made clear our concerns about the military capabilities China continues to pursue, capabilities that only increase tensions in the region and beyond,” Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said in response to the reported test. officials and analysts have underscored in the context of Iran’s development of technology that could deliver a nuclear warhead. Intercontinental ballistic missiles “share many similar technologies and processes inherent in a space launch program,” an overlap that U.S. "Several companies around the world have conducted similar tests.” It is of great significance to reducing the cost of using spacecraft and providing a convenient and cheap way for mankind's two-way transportation in the peaceful use of space,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian told reporters Monday. “This was a routine test of spacecraft to verify technology of spacecraft's reusability. “We have seen China and Russia pursuing very actively the use, the militarization of this technology, so we are just having to respond in kind," he said.Ĭhina maintains that the reported missile test was in fact “a spacecraft” designed to make round trips. Chinese officials deny conducting a weapons test, but Wood cited the development as a catalyst for a hypersonic arms buildup. ![]() That admission followed a report that China tested a hypersonic missile in August that orbited the globe but missed its target by more than 20 miles. “We just don't know how we can defend against that technology, neither does China, neither does Russia.”ĪRMY CHIEF PUSHES BACK ON FORMER SOFTWARE CHIEF’S CLAIM US LOST THE TECHNOLOGY BATTLE TO CHINA “Hypersonic technology is something that we have been concerned about,” said Ambassador Robert Wood, who represents the United States at the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva. The Chinese government has disputed the report, claiming they were testing a spacecraft instead.Īmbassador Robert Wood, who represents the United States at the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva. This comes after a shocking report that China tested a nuclear-capable hypersonic missile earlier this year. military forces “don’t know how to defend” against China and Russia’s most advanced missile systems, a senior U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |